Connect with us

Medtech

University of Cincinnati’s Forbes named a finalist for CNS Innovator of the Year

Jonathan Forbes, MD, assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati Department of Neurosurgery, has been named one of three finalists by the Congress…

Published

on

This article was originally published by BioEngineering

Jonathan Forbes, MD, assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati Department of Neurosurgery, has been named one of three finalists by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons for 2022 Innovator of the Year.

Jonathan Forbes

Credit: Photo/University of Cincinnati

Jonathan Forbes, MD, assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati Department of Neurosurgery, has been named one of three finalists by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons for 2022 Innovator of the Year.

Forbes will make a presentation at the CNS 2022 Annual Meeting in San Francisco on Oct. 10 about his work on a freeware application that creates patient-specific cranial implants using 3D printer technology. His presentation is “Towards Global Availability of Low-cost, Hermetically Precise, Patient-specific Cranial Implants: Creation of the CranialRebuild Freeware Application.”

Attendees at the CNS annual meeting will vote on the three finalists and a Top Innovator will be named Oct. 11.

“I felt both humbled and honored to be named as a finalist for the CNS Innovator of the Year. In particular, I was proud of our research team, including UC engineering professor Dr. Sam Anand, former UC medical student Alice Xu, and UC engineering students Omkar Ghalsasi and Vysakh Venugopal, who committed countless hours to making this technology work. This recognition would not have been possible without their talent and commitment.” Forbes says.

Using an entry-level 3D printer, the freeware application CranialRebuild can provide neurosurgeons in developing countries with access to patient-specific cranial implants (PSCIs) at a small fraction—about 1% —of the cost of what is typically paid in the United States with comparable cosmetic precision, Forbes says.

“Patient-specific cranial implants are especially important to neurosurgical care when it’s necessary to remove a portion of a patient’s skull, such as with a procedure known as a decompressive craniectomy, which is used to relieve high intracranial pressures,” Forbes explains. “When the original flap is not available for reimplantation in developing countries, rudimentary methods such as bending of 2-D titanium mesh or raw molding with bone cement are often used to reconstruct the calvarium. These rudimentary methods can predispose patients to cosmetic deformity or problems with wound healing, which I witnessed firsthand during time spent deployed.”

CranialRebuild analyzes the patient’s CT images and produces a virtual model of the patient’s skull with the defect. It then generates a 3D contour of the cranial implant that will be needed for precise reconstruction. The program creates a virtual model of a negative of this implant, which can then be printed in polycarbonate. The polycarbonate mold is subsequently sterilized and used to contour bone cement into a cosmetically precise patient-specific cranial implant in the operating room. The implant remains with the patient for the rest of their life.

Forbes developed the idea for the application when he returned to the U.S. from Afghanistan after serving there for six months in 2014 as a neurosurgeon with the U.S. Air Force. While in Afghanistan, he treated a number of patients who suffered from suboptimal cosmesis and wound complications—sometimes many years after decompressive craniectomy.

At the UC College of Medicine, Forbes began working with Anand, Xu (Class of 2022), Ghalsai, Venugopal, former medical student Abhijith Matur, MD, Class of 2020, and engineering student Manish Aryal to develop the application. Forbes says that the U.S. poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) patient-specific cranial implants, which are the preferred method of reconstruction when autologous implants are not available, have an average cost of $12,600. An implant in the U.S. made using a 3D printer costs approximately $3,750, or just 30% of a PEEK implant. In the developing world, the cost is approximately $175, or about 1% of the PEEK implant in the U.S., he says.

“Importantly, we expect this technology will advance the quality of neurosurgical care provided to patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy worldwide. It offers the additional potential benefit of helping to reduce health care expenditures in the United States,” Forbes says.

The software application is scheduled for official release next month.







Medtech

ETF Talk: AI is ‘Big Generator’

Second nature comes alive Even if you close your eyes We exist through this strange device — Yes, “Big Generator” Artificial intelligence (AI) has…

Continue Reading
Medtech

Apple gets an appeals court win for its Apple Watch

Apple has at least a couple more weeks before it has to worry about another sales ban.

Continue Reading
Medtech

Federal court blocks ban on Apple Watches after Apple appeal

A federal appeals court has temporarily blocked a sweeping import ban on Apple’s latest smartwatches while the patent dispute winds its way through…

Continue Reading

Trending